Flashlight | Weight w/o bat | Lumens | Runtime | Price | Battery |
Photons | .2 - .3 with | 4.5 + var + s | 12 - 18 hr | 10 - 16 | button cell |
Inova | .35 with | 1 / 6 + s | 22 hr / 10 hr | 8 | 2 buttons |
Fenix E05 | 0.45 | 8 / 25/ 85 | 15 hr / 45 min | 20 | AAA (.4 oz) |
Fenix LD02 | 0.56 | 8 / 25 / 100 | 15 hr / 30 min | 40 | AAA |
4sevens Preon | 0.6 | 2 / 10 / 84 +s | 23 hr / 1 hr | 40 | AAA |
4sevens ML | 0.6 | 4 / 48 / 216 +s | 150 hr / 1.2 hr | 33 | CR123 (.6 oz) |
4sevens MLX | 0.6 | 1.4 / 54 / 252 +s | 100 hr / 1 hr | 50 | CR123 |
Zebra | 1.16 w/o band | .01 -> 446 | 3 month/ 1.4 hr | 69 | CR123 |
Photon Light 2: This light by LRI seems to be the ultralight favorite. It's lightweight, reasonable run-time for the battery and relatively cheap. There's a couple different versions of this, with the classic being the most common, but there's also the Pro, which is waterproof and the Freedom which gives a little more function. Price is also very reasonable for a flashlight but is a little on the expensive side for a battery and a LED (which this light is more than). .2 ounces including battery is more than appealing, but the 4.5 lumens leaves a little to be desired. Could I get away with 4.5 lumens for the whole trip? Sure. Do I want to make that sacrifice? Not really. I'm more than willing to throw a couple dollars at a light that weighs an ounce (with battery) more for more lumens and a longer run-time. But this light definitely fits the bill for EDC and ultralight.
NiteIze Inova: I don't think I saw any forum posts on this light, but it was one of the top choices in an Amazon search. Similar to the Photon but with two batteries rather than one, it allows a longer run time and a 1 lumen / 6 lumen combo. Price is a little cheaper, and the main reason I looked at this light was because I though it had a pocket clip on it. The metal key ring attachment looks open to me, such that you might be able to just slide it onto a ball-cap and have a headlamp. But, I'm pretty sure that's not the case. I've read of people putting velcro on their Photon 2's, which I think is a great idea, but having a clip as part of the package, would have been awesome. Still, it's a valid option for ultralighters, and a contender with the photon.
Fenix E05: This was the most common light for those packing more than a photon. It has a flood lens, is quite lightweight and takes one AAA. Runtime is good, and the functionality is good. The Pre-2014 version was simply a twist on-off 27 lumens, but the 2014 version has three modes. I show the high and low run times in there along with the 25 medium lumen mode. 15 hours on 8 lumens is a pretty good run-time for a 1.5 volt battery. Of course if you're doing night hiking (which we are not planning on doing), you could find yourself requiring a battery in your mail drops. Even then, not having a spare or pre-emptive battery change could find you without a light for a couple nights. A lot of people like this a step up from the Photon and I can definitely see why.
Fenix LD02: Very similar to the E05 but with a throw lens rather than a flood. A little more lumens for a little less run-time. If you're about hot spots, this would be a happy medium between more weight/expense and low cost floods. It also includes a pocket clip that you could attach to your ball-cap which I think should be included with the E05 as well. It should be a good low weight choice for a solid light, but for some reason, I'm not all that attracted to it.
Foursevens Preon 1: I have their Preon 2 model which is simply two AAA rather than one. My fiancé got it for me as a gift, and while I don't EDC it, it rides in my work truck with me and comes out when I need to read an electric meter in a basement. I originally wanted it as really awesome pen light (which it is), but don't find myself using it near as much as I would like to. Run-time for the Preon 1 is really good and I like the special functions. But similar to the LD02, I just find myself either wanting less or more.
Foursevens ML: This is my top two choice. I haven't decided on what I want, but this is a solid contender. 150 hours on 4 lumens!? Yes please. Yes, it's a CR123A battery, and yes the battery cost is a little more and yes it's .2 ounces more. But not having to worry about my battery dying or replacing it for the entire trip, definitely appealing. Did I mention it throws 216 lumens!? If I have a bear in camp, boy will I be glad to shine that in it's eyes. My Fenix LD20, which was my first good flashlight is in the low 200 range and I absolutely love that 2 x AA light. But, the weight on this ML is outstanding. I can more than justify $33 Amazon price for this light to come along with me.
Foursevens MLX: A brother/sister of the ML, it's really just a slightly different model. Nearly everything is the same but it totes a 252 lumens instead of 216. Big difference? Naw. And the huge drawback for me is the loss of 50 hours run-time on low which is also only at 1.4 instead of 4. Would 1.4 be useful? Absolutely. But if I'm going to drop to 1.4 I would require the run-time to be more than less. Obviously this is a trade-off with the variation in the Cree emitter, but that's too significant a handicap for only a 36 lumen gain.
Zebralight H302w: There is so much I love about this light, practically everything, except for the price. Look, I understand high quality usually comes with higher prices, but with a wedding to pay for, and student loans still raining over my head, can I justify it? Well... yes, I can, but should I? Weight is great (for what it is) and the functions are just outstanding (a total of 15 including special modes) and it is designed to be used as a flashlight/headlight combo. 3 month low run-time!? Yes, it's .01 and I'm not sure that will be very usable but even at 2.5 lumens its still 192 hours. Did I mention it has 15 modes? I love versatility and the way this bad boy works is you have 6 standard modes. 3 for L/M/H and 3 for L/M/H "second tier". In each of the L/M/H of the second tier you can program it to choose one of two options (except the Low setting has three options). Does that customizability really matter? Well, no... Is it super awesome? YES! But in all seriousness if you want to set it up for 8.5 Lm, 2.5 Lm and .37 Lm as your Low/Medium2/Low2 settings, you totally can. Or say you want a midway between the Low1 (8.5) and M1 (50) so you choose your M2 to be 22 Lm. Go for it! It's up to you and you can decide how your run-time is affected by what you need. There are 4 options for the lower end of this Zebra model, a flood cool/neutral white and a throw cool/neutral white. I've read that neutral is the preferred for wilderness as it provides a more realistic color balance of nature than a cool white which tends to wash out the colors. But the neutral white is perceived as less bright as the cool white for the same reason. I always thought I liked throw, but I saw a video on Youtube showing the comparison of the two models (the 1090 lumen versions) and I was really impressed with the flood. For a backpacking scenario I think that would be the preferable way to go. This light was the third most chosen for backpacking, #1 Photon, #2 Fenix E05 and #3 Zebralight, but still had a significant following. In the world of flashlights it's surprisingly unheard of, but from what I can tell, it's a serious contender for backpacking.
So my choice isn't final, but for me, it's a competition for the Foursevens ML and Zebralight H302w. I think I'm going to get the ML and give a test run, as it is the cheaper option, and if I don't love it... well, you can probably guess (and maybe it's an excuse to add a sweet flashlight to my collection too).
NiteIze Inova: I don't think I saw any forum posts on this light, but it was one of the top choices in an Amazon search. Similar to the Photon but with two batteries rather than one, it allows a longer run time and a 1 lumen / 6 lumen combo. Price is a little cheaper, and the main reason I looked at this light was because I though it had a pocket clip on it. The metal key ring attachment looks open to me, such that you might be able to just slide it onto a ball-cap and have a headlamp. But, I'm pretty sure that's not the case. I've read of people putting velcro on their Photon 2's, which I think is a great idea, but having a clip as part of the package, would have been awesome. Still, it's a valid option for ultralighters, and a contender with the photon.
Fenix E05: This was the most common light for those packing more than a photon. It has a flood lens, is quite lightweight and takes one AAA. Runtime is good, and the functionality is good. The Pre-2014 version was simply a twist on-off 27 lumens, but the 2014 version has three modes. I show the high and low run times in there along with the 25 medium lumen mode. 15 hours on 8 lumens is a pretty good run-time for a 1.5 volt battery. Of course if you're doing night hiking (which we are not planning on doing), you could find yourself requiring a battery in your mail drops. Even then, not having a spare or pre-emptive battery change could find you without a light for a couple nights. A lot of people like this a step up from the Photon and I can definitely see why.
Fenix LD02: Very similar to the E05 but with a throw lens rather than a flood. A little more lumens for a little less run-time. If you're about hot spots, this would be a happy medium between more weight/expense and low cost floods. It also includes a pocket clip that you could attach to your ball-cap which I think should be included with the E05 as well. It should be a good low weight choice for a solid light, but for some reason, I'm not all that attracted to it.
Foursevens Preon 1: I have their Preon 2 model which is simply two AAA rather than one. My fiancé got it for me as a gift, and while I don't EDC it, it rides in my work truck with me and comes out when I need to read an electric meter in a basement. I originally wanted it as really awesome pen light (which it is), but don't find myself using it near as much as I would like to. Run-time for the Preon 1 is really good and I like the special functions. But similar to the LD02, I just find myself either wanting less or more.
Foursevens ML: This is my top two choice. I haven't decided on what I want, but this is a solid contender. 150 hours on 4 lumens!? Yes please. Yes, it's a CR123A battery, and yes the battery cost is a little more and yes it's .2 ounces more. But not having to worry about my battery dying or replacing it for the entire trip, definitely appealing. Did I mention it throws 216 lumens!? If I have a bear in camp, boy will I be glad to shine that in it's eyes. My Fenix LD20, which was my first good flashlight is in the low 200 range and I absolutely love that 2 x AA light. But, the weight on this ML is outstanding. I can more than justify $33 Amazon price for this light to come along with me.
Foursevens MLX: A brother/sister of the ML, it's really just a slightly different model. Nearly everything is the same but it totes a 252 lumens instead of 216. Big difference? Naw. And the huge drawback for me is the loss of 50 hours run-time on low which is also only at 1.4 instead of 4. Would 1.4 be useful? Absolutely. But if I'm going to drop to 1.4 I would require the run-time to be more than less. Obviously this is a trade-off with the variation in the Cree emitter, but that's too significant a handicap for only a 36 lumen gain.
Zebralight H302w: There is so much I love about this light, practically everything, except for the price. Look, I understand high quality usually comes with higher prices, but with a wedding to pay for, and student loans still raining over my head, can I justify it? Well... yes, I can, but should I? Weight is great (for what it is) and the functions are just outstanding (a total of 15 including special modes) and it is designed to be used as a flashlight/headlight combo. 3 month low run-time!? Yes, it's .01 and I'm not sure that will be very usable but even at 2.5 lumens its still 192 hours. Did I mention it has 15 modes? I love versatility and the way this bad boy works is you have 6 standard modes. 3 for L/M/H and 3 for L/M/H "second tier". In each of the L/M/H of the second tier you can program it to choose one of two options (except the Low setting has three options). Does that customizability really matter? Well, no... Is it super awesome? YES! But in all seriousness if you want to set it up for 8.5 Lm, 2.5 Lm and .37 Lm as your Low/Medium2/Low2 settings, you totally can. Or say you want a midway between the Low1 (8.5) and M1 (50) so you choose your M2 to be 22 Lm. Go for it! It's up to you and you can decide how your run-time is affected by what you need. There are 4 options for the lower end of this Zebra model, a flood cool/neutral white and a throw cool/neutral white. I've read that neutral is the preferred for wilderness as it provides a more realistic color balance of nature than a cool white which tends to wash out the colors. But the neutral white is perceived as less bright as the cool white for the same reason. I always thought I liked throw, but I saw a video on Youtube showing the comparison of the two models (the 1090 lumen versions) and I was really impressed with the flood. For a backpacking scenario I think that would be the preferable way to go. This light was the third most chosen for backpacking, #1 Photon, #2 Fenix E05 and #3 Zebralight, but still had a significant following. In the world of flashlights it's surprisingly unheard of, but from what I can tell, it's a serious contender for backpacking.
So my choice isn't final, but for me, it's a competition for the Foursevens ML and Zebralight H302w. I think I'm going to get the ML and give a test run, as it is the cheaper option, and if I don't love it... well, you can probably guess (and maybe it's an excuse to add a sweet flashlight to my collection too).